![]() |
||
Vol.1,
Issue 3
May - June 2003 |
||
|
|
||
| Return to the Front Page | ||
|
|
|||
Figure 1 shows the structure of the Harrod-Domar model in iThink®/STELLA®.
The diagram presents three important aspects of the model which one can easily
see and recognize:
Now the remaining question is how we learn about the
implications of the Harrod-Domar model of macro-dynamic growth. What is the
growth rate of production in the long run? What if propensity to save is
increased (or decreased)? What would happen if a technological improvement
caused the capital-output-ratio to decrease?
Do we need to engage in analytical mathematics to arrive at the robust answers
to the questions posed above? My answer to this is, "not necessarily".
Actually simulation can help to provide answers to a vast variety of "what-if"
questions. Figure 2 depicts how the slider input device in iThink
and STELLA helps the user to see and compare the time path of economic growth
under different conditions.
Figure 2 show that a decrease in capital-output-ratio due to a boost in
technology causes the annual growth rate to rise from 5 percent to 7.5 percent.
The figure also makes the point that a sudden change in technology may create a
transient high economic growth rate that is well above its equilibrium value.
The Harrod-Domar model of economic growth is simple. The analytical mathematics
required to investigate the model is not so complicated after all. However, if
we decide to change some of the simplistic assumptions in this model, the
mathematics will very quickly become increasing sophisticated.
Having said that, we are not trying to undermine the importance of mathematics
in economics and social sciences. Rather we claim that systems thinking tools
and simulation techniques enable us to easily and effectively learn about the
complexity of economic dynamics without the need for analytical mathematics. |
||||
46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 200, Lebanon, NH 03766-1487 Phone 603-643-9636 / Fax 603-643-9502 |